2013 My14 LX
Manual
7.5L/100ks around the city/suburbs
7.0 - 6.0L/100ks highway driving
And for some weird reason, when I'm down the east coast going from Scamander to St Helens 5.8/100ks
And of course
anywhere between 10-11L/100ks after my fiance drives it (since I've taken part of my snorkel off, he can't help but put his foot down for the extra noise)
***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****
Best fuel economy
Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators
- Mystique
- Lancer MASTER
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Daily: My14 Lancer LX
Weekender: 2009 MY09 Ralliart Hatch
My Mod Thread: viewtopic.php?p=324612#324612
Instagram: http://instagram.com/mitsii_lx
Weekender: 2009 MY09 Ralliart Hatch
My Mod Thread: viewtopic.php?p=324612#324612
Instagram: http://instagram.com/mitsii_lx
- kay christensen
- Post Monster
- Posts: 3203
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:21 pm
- Location: Adelaide South Australia
- Lancer1993
- Genius
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:46 pm
- Location: Caloundra
- Contact:
- kay christensen
- Post Monster
- Posts: 3203
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:21 pm
- Location: Adelaide South Australia
Lancer1993 wrote:I know the smaller engines use less fuel but just how big is the difference?
power wise there is a differnce after having ago at driving andrews the other day i could feel the power difference engine wise and manual to the cvt ( which is mine) but it all depends on how u drive them flog them and u wont get good fuel economy etc if i throw mine into sports mode i dont great fuel economy etc still not bad but not as good as non sports mode
No matter where you are, whether it's a quarter mile or half way across the world, you'll always be with me and always be my BROTHER - Dominic Toretto. RIPPaulWalker
- Lancer1993
- Genius
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:46 pm
- Location: Caloundra
- Contact:
Yeah I know taking it to 6k in 2nd doesn't help LOL
I've not driven a Lancer with CVT but did drive a new Pulsar with one, omg the difference. it was also the base model so stuck with a poky 1.8 and just 96kw so I found it slow and the CVT revving the engine too much it felt like the clutch slipping in a manual.
Back to the Lancer and I know the claimed fuel usage on paper but it will be interesting seeing how it does in a long trip with 3 people and luggage.
I've not driven a Lancer with CVT but did drive a new Pulsar with one, omg the difference. it was also the base model so stuck with a poky 1.8 and just 96kw so I found it slow and the CVT revving the engine too much it felt like the clutch slipping in a manual.
Back to the Lancer and I know the claimed fuel usage on paper but it will be interesting seeing how it does in a long trip with 3 people and luggage.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests