***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****
Fuel economy when you drive in the city/short distances...
Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators
- squala
- Post Monster
- Posts: 2869
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:23 am
- Location: Fines City, VIC, Australia
Modern engines should be more flexible already, would go all out with a lead foot but use fuel wisely when you drive as if an egg is under the pedal. I read somewhere that MIVEC promised better economy when it was launched on the Evo 9. I reckon it also evaded the gas guzzler tax when the car landed in the US.
///// /////
7 airbags
6-speed SST
5-star safety
4-wheel drive
3-diamond badge
2 overhead cams
1 awesome ride
0 demerit points and gutter rash
7 airbags
6-speed SST
5-star safety
4-wheel drive
3-diamond badge
2 overhead cams
1 awesome ride
0 demerit points and gutter rash
Yeah thing is Turbo's add-on a lot of fuel consumption, it's a given. But 10l/100km's for a Turbo engine pulling the horsepower you're doing is good also IMO as well.
Look at other contenders like the Civic Type R, 13.9L/100KMs on paper but I've heard it does more like around the 15-16 mark. Almost like a stock V8.
I say anything around 10 for an Evo or RA is good.
Look at other contenders like the Civic Type R, 13.9L/100KMs on paper but I've heard it does more like around the 15-16 mark. Almost like a stock V8.
I say anything around 10 for an Evo or RA is good.
Sportback VR/GReddy Spectrum Elite/Advanti Medusa/K&N High-Flow Performance Panel Filter/Cusco Racing Braces
- Ellimist
- INACTIVE Member Account
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:42 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
wow i looked at one of those civics. didn't realize they were that bad.
my 2.5 5cyl turbo volvo does 9.0 - 9.4 and thats not being grandma about it. I stopped watching the instant one because it was scaring me. dead set going up a hill is funny to watch until you realize its your fuel cash going straight out the exhaust.
9 - 10l - 100 seems about normal for modern turbo engines.
my 2.5 5cyl turbo volvo does 9.0 - 9.4 and thats not being grandma about it. I stopped watching the instant one because it was scaring me. dead set going up a hill is funny to watch until you realize its your fuel cash going straight out the exhaust.
9 - 10l - 100 seems about normal for modern turbo engines.
- hansmitchel
- Lancer VRX/GTS
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:02 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- hansmitchel
- Lancer VRX/GTS
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:02 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
billy boy wrote:haha, i get shocking fuel economy - usually have done 300km when the fuel light comes on (45l) so i pretty much do around 15l/100km on average (all city driving). the lowest i've got is 10.7 when doing a country run
You probably have another 150Kms on that, till your tank is really empty as we do have a 59L tank.
Blakey wrote:billy boy wrote:haha, i get shocking fuel economy - usually have done 300km when the fuel light comes on (45l) so i pretty much do around 15l/100km on average (all city driving). the lowest i've got is 10.7 when doing a country run
You probably have another 150Kms on that, till your tank is really empty as we do have a 59L tank.
The RA has a smaller tank Blake.
Return to “Evolution X Performance”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests